SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1248

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
S ANKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: KOPPISETTI PARVATI DEVI
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Table of Content
1. court consolidates four cases under same crime number for uniform judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 8)
2. counsel for petitioners argues for bail on grounds of family hardship and innocence. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
3. court analyzes duration of custody, nature of accusations, and witness integrity in bail decision. (Para 5 , 7)

ORDER :

2. The Criminal Petitions have been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/Sections 480 Dated 01.09.2025 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 6 and 7 on bail in Cr.No.46 of 2025 of Jaggampeta Police Station, East Godavari District, registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 6 and 7 herein for the offences punishable under Section 8 (c) read with 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).

3. Ms.T.Rajeswari, the learned counsel, representing Ms.Kopisetti Parvathi Devi, the learned counsel for the petitioners, contend that the petitioners are innocent of the alleged offence and have been falsely implicated by the police. It is furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top