SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1270

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y.LAKSHMANA RAO
Lekkala Demudu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : D.V.V.S.S.N.H. Bhujanga Rao

Table of Content
1. prosecution's case details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for pre-arrest bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. opposition to bail application. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's analysis on eligibility for bail. (Para 8 , 9)
5. conditions and outcome of bail application. (Para 10 , 11)

ORDER :

CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:

CONTENTIONS OF THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS:

4. It is further submitted that there is no recovery attributable to the Petitioners and custodial interrogation is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. The Petitioners have cooperated with the investigation and there is no likelihood of absconding or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Therefore, it is prayed that this Court may be pleased to grant pre-arrest bail to the Petitioner Nos.1 to 3/Accused No.2, 4 and 5 in the interest of justice.

5. Per contra, Ms. P. Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed granting of pre-arrest bail contending that the investigation is at a nascent stage and the custodial interrogation of the Petitioners are imperative for eliciting material facts. It is submitted that if the Petitioners are granted pre-arrest bail, there is a grave apprehension that they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top