SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 93

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, C.J., Ravi Cheemalapati, J.
Kanithi Deepak - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others - Respondents
WP(PIL) No: 239 of 2025
Decided On : 04-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Metta Chendra Sekhar Rao
For the Respondent: Gp For Energy, V V Satish (Sc For Apepdcl), Gp For General Administration, Gp Muncipal Admn And Urban Dev Ap

The court held that public interest litigation cannot be used to challenge tender conditions without proof of arbitrariness or malafide conduct.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 19(1)(g) - Public Interest Litigation - Tender conditions of AP TRANSCO questioned - Technical qualification clauses found arbitrary and designed to favor specific bidders - No established malafide or irrationality shown by respondents. (Paras 1-19)

(B) Judicial review in tender processes - Courts should not interfere unless total arbitrariness or malafide established - Emphasis on fair competition and public procurement principles. (Para 11)

(C) The judgment stresses that a Public Interest Litigation should not be misused for personal or political gain. (Para 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner questioned the tender conditions for various AP TRANSCO projects, alleging they were crafted to benefit specific manufacturers while excluding other bidders, thus compromising fair competition in the tendering process. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
The court found no evidence of arbitrariness or malafide conduct, emphasizing that petitioner's claims were not supported by specific allegations or proofs required for such claims. (Paras 14-16)

Issues: The main issues included whether the tender conditions were arbitrary and whether the petitioner's claims of malafide were substantiated. (Paras 13-19)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the burden lies with the petitioner to demonstrate malafide or arbitrary actions, and found that procedural integrity could not be upheld as the petitioner failed to prove wrongdoing. (Para 14, 15)

Result: The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed. No costs.

Table of Content
1. overview of tender conditions in pil. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims of restrictive and tailored tender conditions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. allegations of arbitrary practices and defense by respondents. (Para 8)

ORDER :

Ravi Cheemalapati, J.

The present Public Interest Litigation has been filed questioning the tender conditions in the tender notifications issued by the Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (for short, 'AP TRANSCO').

2. The case of the petitioner is that the AP TRANSCO has issued four tenders and purchase orders as follows:

(1) Tender No.APT-e-41/2024 dated 22.11.2024 for Supply, Laying , Testing and commissioning of 220 KV, 1000 sq.mm XLPE U/G Copper Cable with associated accessories including services for Jointing, Terminations, Site Testing and Commissioning the complete Cable System for diversion of 220KV VTS-Podili DC line (UG cable -19KM), 220KV VTS-Tallapalli Ckts I&II (UG cable -11KM), 220KV VTS- Tallapalli Ckts IIl&IV (UG cable-11KM) and 220KV VTS-Tadikonda Ckts I&II (UG cable- 14KM) which are passing across the Seed Capital Region (From N10 to End of CRDA Limits) on turnkey basis in Guntur District and consequential Purchase Order no. 1091 dated 04-06-2025;

(2) Tender No. APT-e-46/2024 dated 28.11.2024 for Supply, Erection, Laying, Testing and Commissioning of (i) Upgradation of 132/33kV SS Tadepalli to 220/132/33kV SS with 3X160MVA Power Transformers and Erection of 220kV DC line from 400/220kV GIS Tallayapalem to proposed 220kV SS Tadepalli by laying (ii) 220kV 1000Sq.mm Single core UG cable from 400/220kV GIS Tallayapalem to Kondaveetivagu (9.2KM) &(iii) Stringing of 220kV Line on existing Multi circuit towers up to proposed 220kV SS Tadepalli (4.5KM) in Guntur District and consequential Purchase Order no. 1089 dated 22-05- 2025;

(3) Tender No. APT-e-47/2024 dated 29.11.2024 for Supply (balance), Erection, testing and commissioning of (i) 220/33 KV GIS at Nelapadu, (i) Laying of 220KV DC, 1000 Sq.mm XLPE UG Cable from 400/220 KV GIS Tallayapalem to proposed 220/33kV GIS Nelapadu (11 KM) and (ii) Erection of OH line by making LILO of 220 KV VTS-Podili line to the proposed 220/33 KV GIS Nelapadu (2 KM ) on turnkey basis in CRDA, Guntur District and consequential Purchase Order no. 1095 dated 18-06-2025;

(4) Tender No. APT-e-04/2025 dated 29.07.2025 for Supply, Erection, testing and commissioning of (i) 220/33 kV GIS at Lingayapalem, (ii) Laving of 220KV DC,1000 Sq.mm XLPE UG Cable from 400/220 kV GIS Tallavapalem to 220/33kV GIS Lingayapalem(8 KM) and (iii) Laying of 220kV DC,1000 Sq.mm XLPE UG Cable by making LILO of 220kV VTS-Narasaraopet to proposed 220/33kV Lingayaplem GIS (0.5 KM ) on turnkey basis in CRDA, Guntur District and consequential Purchase Order dated 18-08-2025.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that in the said tender conditions, the technical qualification under Clause 1.3(iv) mandates that bidder must have executed works such as substations, transmission lines, or any infrastructure project of value more than 300 crores for State/Central Government/PSU agencies and under clause 1.3(iii)(A) the bidder must have executed 100% of the tender quantity(290 KM) of 220KV XLPE underground cable within the last 10 years and the same must be in successful commercial operation for atleast two years. In the tender conditions it was specifically mentioned that the bidder meeting the eligibility criteria as mentioned at Clause1.3(iv) above is mandatorily required to appoint a sub-contractor who meets the technical qualification criteria as mentioned in Clause No. 1.3(iii) as well as Cable Manufacturers Qualification Criteria as mentioned at Clause No.1.4(l).

4. Further, the Clause 1.4(I) mandates that the manufacturer of Extra High (EHV) cables having experience in supplying of cable of respective voltage for at least last five years as on the date of tender publishing date who must have supplied 100% of Copper conductor cable of offered conductor size of higher size of 220 kV o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top