IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.
Rallapalli Srinivasa Sri Venkata Rama Subrahmanyam @ RSSVR Subrahmanyam S/o R. Someswar Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 974 of 2026
Decided On : 24-03-2026
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Petition under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short "BNSS"), has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused No.29, seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No.470 of 2024 of Tirupati East Police Station, Tirupati District registered for the offences under Sections 274, 275, 316(5), 318(3), 318(4), 61(2), 299 read with 49 read with 3(5) of BNS and Sections 51 and 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for short "FSS Act").
2. It is alleged against the Petitioner / Accused No.29 that, he worked as General Manager (Procurement), TTD, Tirupati during the periods from 06.07.2017 to 17.05.2018 and from 13.05.2020 to 01.05.2023, and that he was the head of the Procurement Section responsible for procurement of various commodities, including “Agmark Special grade cow ghee” for the preparation of sacred Srivari Laddu Prasadams. It is also alleged that, as a member of the technical team for plant inspection, he accepted undue advantage and issued a favourable plant inspection report in favour of M/s Bhole Baba Organic Dairy Milk Private Limited. Further, it is alleged that during the period from March 2022 to April 2023, he demanded and accepted undue advantage and extended official favour to M/s Bhole Baba Organic Dairy Milk Private Limited, M/s Sri Vyshnavi Dairy Specialities Private Limited, and M/s Malganga Milk and Agro Products Private Limited.
3. Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner and Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the allegations levelled against the Petitioner are wholly false and untenable. Even assuming that any adulteration in ghee was found, it is the statutory duty of the Deputy Executive Officer (Warehousing) to issue notices, place the matter on file, and initiate appropriate action, and the Petitioner had no role or responsibility in initiating any such proceedings.
It is further submitted that the report in question was not issued by the Petitioner but the same was issued by the Plant Inspection Team. The investigation agency's claim that the reports of the inspection committees were manipulated by the Petitioner is baseless, as all such reports are prepared and signed by independent dairy experts and senior officials, including members of the Ghee Committee from outside TTD, such as experts from Bangalore and Hyderabad, who conduct independent inspections and assessments. The Petitioner's role was limited to coordination of visits.
Learned Senior Counsel would submit that when Bhole Baba Dairy failed to furnish requisite documents in June 2022, it was duly found not qualified for the subsequent supply period commencing November 2022. Further, the exclusion of “Beta Sitosterol” from the tender conditions was a decision taken by the Executive Officer based on expert recommendations and in conformity with prevailing FSSAI standards, and the Petitioner had no role in such decision. Therefore, the allegation of any undue advantage is baseless.
It is further submitted that the petitioner is being falsely implicated and harassed despite having discharged his duties in his capacity as GM (Procurement). It is submitted that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, and other officers, including experts, have not been arrested.
Therefore, no prejudice would be caused to the investigation if the Petitioner is granted bail, as there is no likelihood of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
Learned Senior Counsel contends that the petitioner has fully cooperated with the investigation, appeared before the SIT on multiple occasions, and furnished all documents and explanations as sought. It is also submitted that the Petitioner is suffering from serious ailments including hypertension and epilepsy, requiring continuous medical care. The Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 27.11.2025 and is ready to abide by any of th
The Court ruled that cooperation with investigations and the presumption of innocence warranted bail for accused in a case involving food adulteration and conspiracy, despite serious charges.
Bail is the rule, not the exception; accused's cooperation and absence of evidence of witness tampering justified his release.
The court grants bail based on the absence of direct involvement in contract violations and prior cooperation with the investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.