Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y.LAKSHMANARAO
Kollu Ravindra, B – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J.
These two Criminal Petitions are heard and disposed of by way of this common order, as the facts and circumstances in these two cases are identical, but, of course, some of the Petitioners are different, albeit they arise out of two different cases.
2. Criminal Petition No.1616 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.1755 of 2025 have been filed challenging the chargesheet filed in C.C.No.1152 of 2020 on the file of the learned II Additional judicial First-Class Magistrate, Machilipatnam for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 188 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the I.P.C., in Crime No.06/2020 of Robertsonpet Polic Station; and C.C.No.1304 of 2020 on the file of the learned Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate, Machilipatnam for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 188 (Para-II) of ‘the I.P.C.,’ and Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, the Act., in Crime No.100/2020 of Pedana Police Station.
3. The allegation against the Petitioners in C.C.No.1152/2020 is that the Petitioners formed into an unlawful assembly at a particular center of the city of Machilipatnam sitting in the main road and giving slogans for
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a criminal complaint can be quashed if it is barred by law under specific provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(1) Voluntarily obstructing public servant from discharge of his public functions – Section 195(1)(a)(i) of Cr.P.C. bars court from taking cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 172 to 1....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
