D.R.VITHAL RAO, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
B. V. NARAYANA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution raises an interesting question as to the scope of the Karnataka Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 ('act' for short ). Petitioner seek a mandamus to the State Government to consider and dispose of their representation dt. 10-4-1983 as to the question of declaring the 'attara Cutcherry', a Government building in which the Karnataka High Court is housed, as a "protected monument" under S. 4 of the said Act. The petition is filed as sequel to the Government Order No. DPAR/188/shc/82 dt. 24-3-1982 which has accorded administrative approval for the demolition of the existing 'attara Cutcherry' and for the construction of a new High Court Building on the site. This petition is before us on its reference to a Division Bench by Swami, J.
( 2 ) PETITIONERS in their efforts to avert the demolition of this ancient building, which they cherish as a cultural-heritage and as an enduring source of enrichment of the environmental beauty and cultural-tone of the City of Bangalore, now appeal to the provisions of the 'act'. They have also challenged the decision of Government as an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.