SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 406

H.G.BALAKRISHNA
VISHWABHARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Gopal Hegde, N.D.R.Ramachandra Rao

H. G. BALAKRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners have sought for a declaration that Rule 8 of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 providing for levy of Registration fee is ultra vires and unconstitutional and for a declaration that the Bangalore Development Authority has no authority of law to collect application fee for allotment of sites. They have also sought for a direction to respondent-1 to refund to the concerned general public all the amounts received by it in the form of registration fee and application fee under the impugned rule.

( 2 ) UNDER Section 69 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), respondent-2 which is the State of Karnataka has framed rules called the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rule' ). Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules read as follows:- "8. REGISTRATION:- (1) Every applicant for a site shall register his name on payment of registration fees as specified in the table below. If an applicant withdraws the registration the Authority shall refund to such applicant the entire registration fee paid by him after deducting ten pe









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top