SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Kar) 173

N.D.V.BHATT
M. N. RAMU ALIAS RAMSHETTY – Appellant
Versus
SARASWATHAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.Veerappa, S.R.HEGDE

N. D. V. BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is preferred against the order dated 14-9-1990 passed by the Munsiff, sagar on LA. No. IV in O. S. No. 30 of 1989. The facts relevant for the disposal of this petition, briefly stated, are as under:

( 2 ) THE instant respondent- rplaintiff, Saraswath amma had filed O. S. No. 30/1989 on the file of the Munsiff, Sagar praying for a decree for permanent injunction restraining the revision petitioner-defendant from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of suit property which is a residential house. In the course of the said suit she had obtained a temporary injunction by an order dated 18-2-1989 against the defendant revision petitioner. When this was so it appears, according to the case made out by the instant respondent, that the defendant (revision petitioner) in violation of the order of temporary injunction with the aid of goondas removed the tiles of the house in question and dispossessed her from the suit house. Under these circumstances, the respondent filed the application at I A. IV praying to restore her possession after removing the defendant from the suit house.

( 3 ) THE said application at LA. IV was resisted by the p



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top