SYED KALEEM – Appellant
Versus
MYSORE LAKSHMI BEEDI WORKS – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD both counsel. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure for setting aside the order dated 6-12-1991 passed by the III Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mysore, in C. C. No. 3680-1988, ordering framing of charge against the accused under Section 120-A, 120-B and 420 of IPC.
( 2 ) IN the Court below, the petitioner is accused No. 2 and 1st respondent is the Complainant. Accused No. 1 Syed Khasim having died, is not made a party in this Revision Petition. The facts leading to the filing of this petition briefly stated are as follows : the complainant is said to be the proprietor of Mysore Lakshmi Beedi Works, Maddur, According to him, it is a well established firm enjoying immense reputation and good sales of his beedies. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are also said to be traders in beedies at Mandya, carrying on business under different trade names. Having come to know that accused persons were selling their beedies by using the trade mark of the complainant i. e. , 'mysore Lakshmi Beedies' the complainant filed a private complaint against them in PCR No. 27/88 before the III Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.