SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 346

S.VENKATARAMAN
C. C. SUBBARAYA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
C. V. ANANTHANARAYANA SETTY – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Vedavyasachar, S.V.Subbanna, V.TARKARAM

S. VENKATARAMAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by respondent-3 in Arbitration Case No. 1/73 on the file of the Civil Judge, Hassan, against his order rejecting his application under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act and passing a decree in accordance with the award.

( 2 ) THE appellant and respondent-5 are the sons of fourth respondent. First respondent is the son-in-law of fourth respondent and brother-in-law of the appellant and respondent-5. Second respondent is the brother-in- law of fourth respondent. Third respondent is a cousin of first respondent.

( 3 ) RESPONDENTS 1 to 3 filed the petition before the lower court under Section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') stating that the appellant and respondent-4 and 5 had referred their dispute regarding partition of their family properties to them by means of a deed of submission dated 23-1-1972, that on 24-1-1972 they met the appellant and respondents-4 and 5 and collected particulars regarding their properties and liabilities, that on 23-5-1972 the fourth respondent wrote a letter to them requesting them to decide their disputes as per the deed of submission and that on 21-9-1972 they have passed





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top