( 1 ) THIS appeal arises from the judgment under Section 30 (1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, for short, 'the act' from the judgment and award dated 29. 7. 1998 delivered by the workmen's compensation commissioner (sub-divn. 1), Bangalore in wca/cr/5/97 awarding compensation to the injured claimant of the sum of Rs. 2,54,148 with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum.

( 2 ) THE commissioner accepted the claimant's case that he was getting monthly salary of Rs. 1,800 and bhatta of Rs. 50 per day, that is, Rs. 1,500 per month and thus in total he was getting wages to the tune of Rs. 3,300. It also found that the age of the claimant at the time of accident was 28 years. The commissioner also found that the claimant was working as a workman under the owner of the vehicle, namely, respondent No. 2 before it, that is before the workmen's compensation commissioner, who is respondent No. 1 in the memo of appeal. In other words commissioner held that the present respondent No. 2 in the appeal was an employee of respondent No. 1, the owner of the vehicle. It had relied on the evidence given by the claimant including two documents filed and observed that no evidence h