SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 759

V.P.GOEL, R.B.MEHROTRA
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. , ETAWAH – Appellant
Versus
SHAKUNTALA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.SARAN, VINIT SAREN

R. B. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) SRI A. B. Saran, learned Senior Advocate appearing for New India Assurance Company in F. A. F. O. No. 278 of 1994 has raised following two submissions for consideration at the outset which also arise for consideration in other two F. A. F. O. s mentioned above, as such, all the three F. A. F. O. s are being decided together.

( 2 ) THE procedure contemplated for deciding First Appeal From Order before the High Court should be same as the procedure contemplated by S. 96 of C. P. C. in deciding the First Appeals and since there has been along consistent practice of this Court that the First Appeals have never been dismissed in limine, the same procedure should be applied for deciding the F. A. F. O. and the notice should be issued to the opposite parties as a matter of right and record of the case should be summoned in every case.

( 3 ) THOUGH under S. 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the Insurance Company can resist the claim of the insurer only on the grounds contemplated by S. 149 (2) of the Act, but at the stage of appeal filed by the Insurance Company under S. 173 of the Act, the Insurance Company is entitled to urg





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top