SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 347

D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR, A.M.FAROOQ
MEHAFOZ ALAM DASTAGIRSAB KILLEDAR – Appellant
Versus
SHAGUFTA – Respondent


Advocates:
S.SHASTRY, V.V.JOSHI

SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act by a Mohammedan husband complaining against the correctness and validity of the judgment and decree dated 16. 8. 2001 passed by the family Court at Belgaum in O. S. No. 24/00 whereby the Family Court has decreed the suit of the respondent/wife and granted a decree of divorce in favour of the wife by dissolving the marriage between the parties and decreed the suit which had been filed invoking the provisions of sub-section (ii) of Section 2 of Dissolution of Muslim marriage Act, 1939.

( 2 ) THE husband being aggrieved by this judgment and decree of the Family Court dissolving his marriage with the respondent/wife is in appeal before us.

( 3 ) SRI V. V. Joshi, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that an interesting question of law governing the interpretation of sub-section (ii) of Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) arises in this appeal and the out come of the appeal essentially depends on the interpretation that has to be placed on Section 2 (ii) of the Act and submits that the appeal has to be allowed and the judgment and

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top