MANAGING DIRECTOR – Appellant
Versus
SHIVAYANANAMATH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the appellant/corporation, challenging the award passed by the Labour Court and order of the learned Single Judge in W P No 5978/1999 in not interfering with that award
( 2 ) WITH consent of both sides, taken for final hearing and heard It is submitted for the appellant/ Corporation that the Tribunal has wrongly held charge as not proved even though, by the documents produced and marked in the case, proved the charge and the learned Single Judge has also failed to appreciate the same and consequently, interference is required On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent/workman supported the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge Perused the records carefully
( 3 ) FACTS, which gave rise to the present appeal, are: The respondent, while working as conductor under the appellant, was subjected to domestic enquiry on the charge of not issuing tickets to 6 passengers despite collection of fare from them on 21 8 1992 On proof of the same, he was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority So, he raised an industrial dispute before the Labour Court, which held charge as not proved and set aside the order of dismissal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.