SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 477

V.G.SABHAHIT
CHINNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
R. VENKATASWAMY – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Krishna Bhat, G.PAPI REDDY, S.K.SRINIVASAN

V. G. SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Order 47, Rule 1, CPC, is filed for review of the judgment and decree passed by this Court in R. F. A. No. 11/1998, dated 17-4-1998 and for reconsideration of the appeal, R. F. A. No. 11/1998.

( 2 ) THE essential facts of the case leading up to this petition are as follows :- parties would be referred to with reference to their rank before the trial Court.

( 3 ) PETITIONERS herein filed O. S. No. 9/1990 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), KGF, for partition and separate possession, declaration, mesne profits and other reliefs against defendants. After trial, the trial Court dismissed the suit by answering Issues against plaintiffs by its judgment and decree dated 19-12-1997. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree dismissing the suit, plaintiffs filed R. F. A. No. 11/1998 on the file of this Court and this Court by its order dated 17-4-1998 dismissed the appeal.

( 4 ) IT is case of plaintiffs that : one Kaki Muniyappa had a son by name Chikka Appoji, who in turn had a son by name Kaki Ramaiah; Kaki Ramaiah married one Menasamma and had two sons and 4 daughters through her and two sons are defendants 1 and 2, the daughters Mu












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top