SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 1007

V.JAGANNATHAN
EUREKA FORBES LIMITED, KOLKATA – Appellant
Versus
PENTAIR WATER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, GOA – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Udaya Holla,Sri S. Vijaya Shankar

JUDGMENT

All these appeals arise out of one and the same order passed by the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City, and, hence, common judgment.

2. The appellant, M/s. Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 15302 of 2006 and the said suit was filed praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the respondent, M/s. Pentair Water India Private Limited, the defendant from publishing, placing of advertisement or in any manner circulating or distributing any material defaming or maligning the plaintiffs product 'Aquaguard' or ' ‘UV purifier' or from issuing disparaging statements about the said Aquaguard or UV purifier, and also prayed for a decree of mandatory injunction directing the respondent-defendant to withdraw the advertisement, pamphlets or such other material containing the disparaging and false information relating to UV purifier and also for a direction to the defendant to public in the newspapers and media a statement that insofar as UV purifier is concerned, the assertion made by the defendant is not based on any scientific information. The appellant also filed applications as per I.A. Nos. I and II fo


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top