N.KUMAR
M/S. MYSORE TOOLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/S. DOMINION HARDWARE STORES – Respondent
( 2 ) THE claim of the petitioner was opposed by the respondent by filing statement of objections. They deny the entries made in the statement of accounts. In fact, they admit the supplies. But, they contend that the entire among due to the petitioner has been paid. In the legal notice issued prior to initiation of the proceedings the interest claimed is only 6%, whereas in the application 12% interest has been claimed which is without any basis. It is also contended that the claim is barred by law of limitation. Subsequently, they have filed additional objection contending that the entire claim is barred by limitation.
( 3 ) APPLICANT has filed affidavit by way of examination-in-chief and he has produced the statement of accounts and invoices on the basis of which the said claim is made. They are marked. Ex. P-1 is the accounts extract and Exs. p-2 to p-92 are the invoices under which supplies were made by the company under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.