SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(SC) 141

A. K. SARKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, S. K. DAS, S. R. DASS
Hindustan Forest Company – Appellant
Versus
Lal Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAVANI LAL, K.P.GUPTA, N.H.Hingorani, S.K.KAPOOR

Judgement

A. K. SARKAR, J.: This appeal arises out of a suit filed in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir for recovery of price of goods sold and delivered. The only point involved in it is whether the suit was governed by Art. 115 of the Jammu and Kashmir Limitation Act. The courts below have held, and this has not been disputed in this appeal, that if that article did not apply, the suit would fail on the ground of limitation.

2. Sometime in November 1946 the parties entered into an agreement in writing for the supply, by the sellers, the respondents, to the buyer, the appellant, of 5,000 maunds of maize, 500 maunds of wheat and 100 maunds of Dal at the rates and times specified. The agreement stated that on the date it had been made the buyer had paid to the sellers as, 3,000 and had agree to pay a further sum of Rs. 10,000 with ten or twelve days as advance and the balance due for the price of goods delivered after the expiry of every month. It is admitted that the said sum of Rs. 10,000 was later paid by the buyer to the sellers.

3. Various quantities of goods were thereafter delivered by the sellers to the buyer and though such deliveries had not been made strictly at the times

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top