ASHOK B.HINCHIGERI
Vijay Kumar @ Kavla – Appellant
Versus
State by Anekal Police – Respondent
Ashok B. Hinchigeri, J.
The respondent registered Crime No.71/2008 for the offences punishable under Section 302 and 201 IPC.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioners have been in judicial custody in connection with Crime No.163/2008 for the offences punishable under Section 399 and 402 IPC. The jurisdictional Court issued body warrant order on 17.05.2008. It is also not in dispute that the said order is received by the jail authorities on 19.05.2008. The charge-sheet ought to have been filed within 90 days from the date of the receipt of the body warrant order. But the same has not been done in the instant case. It is filed on the 92nd day, i.e. 19.08.2008. Meanwhile on the 91st day, the application under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C was filed on behalf of the petitioners. But the said application was rejected by the Magistrate by his order, dt. 23.08.2008.
3. Aggrieved by the said order and agitating his entitlement to statutory bail, this petition is presented.
4. Heard Sriyuths Anees Ali Khan, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Honnappa, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent. The question that arises for my consideration is: whe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.