SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Kar) 65

High Court of Karnataka
MANJULA CHELLUR & A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA
Aparajit Basak
Versus
State by High Grounds Police Station
Cri.A.No.325 of 2007
Decided on: 18-01-2010

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Aparajit Basak, Party-in-person, Shankar Naik, B. Venkat Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondent: S.B. Pavin, SPP.

Headnote:INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Sections 302,307 & 39: [Manjula Chellur & A.N. Venugopala Gowda,JJ] Homicidal death - Intention to rob cash of Rs.5 lakhs - Dead body of deceased and one injured found in hotel room - Presence of dead body of deceased in bath tub with plaster on forehead and mouth apart from hands and legs being tied with rope - Established by evidence of witnesses from hotel, police, close friends and colleagues of deceased - Viscera of the dead body did contain sedative drug - However, this drug did not lead to death - Injuries both external and internal leading to conclusion that death of deceased was not a natural one but a homicide alone due to compression over mouth, nostrils and neck - Held, Absence of direct evidence on which portion of body injection was administered is immaterial. Plausible that injection marks were unnoticed by medical expert. Conviction was not interfered with.

Judgment :-

1. These 3 appeals arise out of common judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 5.2.2007 in SC. 662/2001 on the file of Fast Track Court-I (Sessions), Bangalore.

2. The appeal in No.325/2007 is filed by one Mr. Aparajit Biswanath Basak who was arrayed as accused No.1, appeal No.781/2007 is filed by one Ram Rakshaw Jaiswal, who was arrayed as 2nd accused and appeal No.468/2007 is filed by one Mr. Pankaj Kumar Roy who was arrayed as accused No.3, in SC.No.662/2001 on the file of the trial Court.

3. The learned trial Judge by the Judgment of conviction convicted accused Nos.1 to 3 for the offences punishable under sections 302, 307 and 328 read with section 34 of IPC, apart from convicting them for offences under sections 392 read with section 397 of IPC. They were acquitted of offences punishable under sections 420 and 120-B of IPC and so also in respect of offence punishable under section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The substantive sentence of imprisonment of life was in respect of offence punishable under section 302 of IPC. So far as other offences lesser sentence was imposed. Aggrieved by the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence the appellants-accused are before us.

4. At length we have heard Mr. Aparajit Basak in person and the learned Counsels appearing for other two appellants. The learned SPP Mr. S.B. Pavin argued for the prosecution seeking confirmation of judgment of conviction and sentence.

5. In brief the case of the prosecution is as under: One Mr. K.R. Anantha Padmanabha Acharya (herein after called as ‘Acharya’ for short) was working as Manager at M/s Trade Wings Limited, Lavelle Road in the Department of Foreign Exchange. One Mr. Susainathan was also working with deceased Acharya as on the date of murder of Mr. Acharya on 7.5.2001. According to the prosecution deceased Acharya left his office at about 1.30 pm on 7.5.2001 after informing Mr. Susainathan-P.W.1 that he was proceeding to Hotel Ashoka with his friend P.W.2 – Narasimhan with Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs) for exchange of the same towards foreign currency by some delegates. However, Mr. Acharya did not return to the office though he informed that he would return between 4.00 pm to 5.00 p.m. on that day. The efforts of P.W.1 to reach Acharya on mobile were futile. Though he tried to reach P.W.2 Narasimhan-friend of the deceased he was unable to reach him as well. One Mr. Ramesh-brother-in-law of P.W.2 contacted P.W.1-Susainathan and through P.W.1 Mr. Ramesh learnt that deceased Acharya and P.W.2 Narasimhan had gone to hotel Ashoka, no one was able to reach them on their mobiles. Making inquiries at the Hotel Ashoka with the staff was of no assistance. However, none of the family members and their acquaintances including P.W.1 had any clue whatsoever about the whereabouts of deceased Acharya and P.W.2 on 7.5.2001. Therefore, P.W.1-Susainathan lodged man-missing complaint in respect of Acharya in Crime No.270/2001 with Ulsoor Gate Police Station by 4.00 a.m. on 8.5.2001. Similarly man-missing complaint of P.W.2-Narasimhan was lodged at the Sadashivanagar Police Station. When deceased did not return home as P.W.1 and the police found the car of the deceased and scooter of Mr. Narasimhan in the parking place of Hotel Ashoka, they approached the receptionist of hotel Ashoka to inquire about the deceased and P.W.2, and also which of the rooms were vacated. On enquiry with the housekeeping and checking of the records, it was learnt in front of room No.523, a sign board of “do not disturb” was hung. It was learnt from housekeeping boys that since the previous day the said board was hung and no order whatsoever came to be placed for any requirements from the said room. On summoning the Manager of Hotel Ashoka, with the help of a duplicate key, the door of the room was opened. To their shock, they found Mr. Narasimhan-P.W.2 sitting in a chair like a disoriented person looking lost. In the bath room of room No.523, Mr. Acharya w




































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top