N.KUMAR, H.S.KEMPANNA
R. Manjunath – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Rep. By its Secretary Dept. of Personnel And Administrative Reforms Vidhana Soudha – Respondent
N. Kumar, J.
In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dated 25.5.2009 striking down The Karnataka Civil Services (Absorption of persons appointed on contract basis against backlog vacancies in the category of Assistant Engineers and Junior Engineers) in the Departments of the Public Works Engineering, Water Resources and Rural Development and Panchayath Raj (Special Rules) 2005 as being contrary to the provisions of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and several decisions of the Supreme Court and consequently declaring that all appointments under the said rules are illegal, null and void. The writ petitions are preferred both by the State as well as by the persons whose employment under the said Rules were struck down.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original applications.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. The Government of Karnataka, on 4.7.1977, revised the policy of reservation in appointments and posts in the State Civil Services and determined 15% in favour of the Scheduled Castes and 3% in favour of the Scheduled Tribes. The Gover
State of Karnataka and another Versus Suvarna Malini reported in 2001(1) SCC 728
STATE OF ASSAM Versus KANAK CHANDRA DUTTA reported in AIR 1967 SC 884
P.R. NAIK Versus UNION OF INDIA reported in 1972(1) SCC 332
R.K. SABHARWAL AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS reported in 1995(2) SCC 745
71K.NARAYANAN AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in AIR 1994 SC 55
UNION OF INDIA Versus A.R. SHINDE AND ANOTHER reported in 1987 (2) SCC 1
STATE OF KARNATAKA Versus S.V. NARAYANAPPA reported in AIR 1967 SC 1071; [1967 (1) S.C.R. 128]
R.N. NANJUNDAPPA Versus T. THIMMAIAH reported in (1972) 1 SCC 409.
B.N. NAGARAJAN Versus STATE OFKARNATAKA reported in AIR 1979 SC 1681 ; [(1979) 3 SCR 937
Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Versus Workmen (2007) 1 SCC 408
Gangadhar Pillai Versus Siemens Ltd. (2007)1 SCC 533
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan Versus L.V. Subramanyeshwara and another reported (2007)5 SCC 326
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Versus Dan Bahadur Singh and Others reported in (2007)6 SCC 207.
UP STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Versus POORAN CHANDRA PANDEY reported in (2007) 11 SCC 92
Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248.
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Versus M.L. KESARI & ORS reported in AIR 2010 SC 2587
State of Karnataka and another Versus Suvarna Malini reported in 2001(1) SCC 728
STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER Versus MAMATHA MOHANTY reported in (2011) 3 SCC 436
The Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd. versus The Notified Area Committee
Rameshchandra Kachardas Porwal versus State of Maharashtra (1981) 2 SCR 866
Bates versus Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone (1972) 1 WLR 1373
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.