ANAND BYRAREDDY
V. P. Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
G. Padmavathi – Respondent
Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent.
2. The appellant was the plaintiff before the trial court and had filed a suit for specific performance of contract. It was stated that the defendant was the absolute owner of a property bearing No.10/6, 6th Main, Magadi Road Chord Road, Corporation Division No.29, Govindarajanagar, Bangalore – 560 040, which was morefully described in the suit schedule.
It was claimed that the defendant had need for money and therefore had approached the plaintiff and offered to sell the property and an agreement of sale was executed on 12.1.2000, under which the defendant had agreed to sell the suit property in favour of the plaintiff, for a sale consideration of Rs.4,50,000/. The defendant is also said to have received a sum of Rs.4,00,000/on the date of the agreement as advance sale consideration. The remaining amount of Rs.50,000/was to be paid at the time of execution of the sale deed, which was to be executed within three months from the date of the agreement, subject to the plaintiff paying the cost of registration and conveyance.
It is claimed by the plaintiff that he was ready with the balanc
Vishnu vs. Abdulgani, 2013(1) KCCR 105
Silvey and others vs. Arun Varghese and another, (2008)11 SCC 45
Pratap Lakshman Muchandi vs. Shamlal Uddavadas Wadhwa, (2008)12 SCC 67
Laxman Tatyaba Kankate vs. Taramati Harishchandra Dhatrak, (2010)7 SCC 717
Motilal Jain vs. Ramdasi Devi, (2000)6 SCC 420
Saradamani Kandappan vs. S.Rajalakshmi
K.S.Vidyanadam and others v. Vairavan (1997) 3 SCC 1: (AIR 1997 SC 1751: 1997 AIR SCW 956)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.