N.KUMAR, V.SURI APPA RAO
H. N. Shivanna – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
N. Kumar, J.— In all these writ appeals, the order passed by the learned Single Judge upholding the acquisition proceedings and consequently dismissing the writ petitions are challenged. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the writ petitions. The petitioner Nos. 1 to 5 in W.P. No. 14391/2006 are the absolute owners of the land in Sy. No. 236 measuring 2 acres situated at Rajapura Village, Jigani Hobli Anekal Taluk, Bangalore. Petitioner Nos. 6 and 7 in the said writ petition are the absolute owners in Sy. No. 68/1 measuring 3 acres 5 guntas situated in the same Village. Similarly, petitioner Nos. 8 to 10 in the writ petition are the absolute owners of the land bearing Sy. No. 236 measuring 1 acre 39 guntas as well as Sy. No. 237 measuring 30 guntas situated in the same Village. Petitioner Nos. 11 to 13 are the absolute owners of the land in Sy. No. 237 measuring 3 acres 18 guntas situated in the same Village. The petitioners in W.P. No. 12970/2006 are the absolute owners of the land in Sy. No. 235 measuring 4 acres 6 guntas in the said Village.
2. The Government of Karnataka issued a notification under Section 3(1) of the
Karnata
Udai Ram Sharma and others V. The Union of India and others reported in AIR 1968 SC 1138
P. Narayanappa and Another V. State of Karnataka and others reported in (2006) 7 SCC 578
Ram Chand and Others V. Union of India And Others reported in (1994) 1 SCC 44
State of Gujarat V. Patel Raghav Natha reported in AIR 1969 SC 1297
Mansaram V. S. P. Pathak reported in (1984)1 SCC 125
Ambalal Purshottam V. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation reported in AIR 1968 SC 1223
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.