A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
RAMAKRISHNAPPA – Appellant
Versus
K. M. ANJINAPPA – Respondent
The plaintiff has filed this appeal. O.S.No.252/1993 filed in the Court of Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Malur, to pass a decree of declaration that the sale transaction of the suit property between the defendants is not binding on the plaintiff and for grant of perpetual injunction against the defendants, specifically to perform the decree passed in O.S.No.25/1989 and for execution of the sale deed and put him in full possession having been dismissed, R.A.No.257/2005 was filed in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), at Kolar. The II Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Kolar, itinerating at Malur, having dismissed the appeal, this second appeal was filed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal will be referred to as the plaintiff and the defendants i.e., in the rank in which they stood in the Trial Court.
3. The plaintiff and the defendant No.1 are brothers. The plaintiff had filed O.S.No.25/1989 in the Court of Munsiff at Malur, against his brother, the first defendant and his father Sri Chinnappaiah @ Erappa, to pass a decree and declare that the registered partition deed dated 30.09.1980 is void and for restraining the defendants from alienating the ‘C’ Sch
SHRI AUDH BEHARI SINGH Vs. GAJADHAR JAIPURIA
MATTOO DEVI (SMT.) Vs. DAMODAR LAL, (DECEASED) BY L.Rs.
RADHAKISHAN LAXMINARAYAN TOSHNIWAL Vs. SHRIDHAR RAMCHANDRA ALSHI
KRISHNA DASS AGARWAL Vs. KANHAIYALAL
KUMAR GONSUSAB Vs. MOHAMMED MIYAN URF BABAN
P.A. RAHIM AND ANOTHER Vs. P.K. RAVINDRAN ALIAS RAVICHANDRAN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.