B. VEERAPPA, J.

1. It is an unfortunate case where the petitioner/defendant and his counsel are blaming the Court, for the lack of institutional responsibility on their part. After arguing the matter for some time, Sri S. Prakash Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to unconditionally withdraw the allegations made in para 6 of the writ petition. In the interest of justice, same is permitted.

2. The petitioner/defendant filed the present writ petition against the order dated 08.01.2018 made in O.S. No. 111/2017 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Ramanagara, rejecting the applications filed by the defendant under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure with cost of Rs. 500/-.

3. The present respondent who is the plaintiff before the Trial Court filed suit in O.S. No. 111/2017 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Ramanagara, for ejectment directing the defendant to quit and deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule premises, and for payment of damages of Rs. 2,50,000/- per month to the plaintiff, along with interest at the rate of 24% per annum from 24.01.2016 till realization, for the defendant's unauthorized use and occupation of the