H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY, J.

1. In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order of the learned single Judge dated 10.08.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.20541/2017, where under the application of the present appellant filed under Order I Rule 10 of CPC, 1908, seeking his impleadment as respondent No.8 was rejected.

2. In this writ appeal, the appellant has taken a contention that the learned single Judge has failed to appreciate that, admittedly, the appellant was the absolute owner in continuous possession and enjoyment of the properties involved in the writ petition, having purchased the same under a registered deed of conveyance dated 11.03.1908, as such, any order in regard to the said property would directly affect the rights of the appellant. Citing a Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in (2010) 7 SCC 417, wherein the general rule regarding the impleadment of parties has been laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the appellant has again stated that his lawful possession of the property involved in the matter for more than 110 years has been ignored by the learned single Judge. Further stating that the reasons given by the learned single Judge while p