Alok Aradhe, J.

Smt. Anu Chengappa P., learned counsel for the petitioner.

Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1, 4 to 7.

Sri. Mahboob Ali Khan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.8 and 9.

2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.

3. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia has prayed for the following reliefs:

"1. Set aside in part the impugned order dated 07.06.2017 in MAG(4) Misc.C.R.132/2016-17(Annexure-A) in so far as the matter has been remanded for enquiry.

2. Restore the order dated:

18.11.2015 in MSC/35/2014-15 (Annexure-C).

3. Direct the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Respondents to evict the Eighth and Ninth Respondents from No.16, Albert Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore -25 according to the order dated: 18.11.2015 in MSC/35/2014-15 (Annexure-C) without resorting to a bailiff.

4. Direct the First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents to initiate enquiry and undertake suitable action against the Tenth Respondent for the illegal and unauthorized actions committed by him against the Petitioner and her family members.

5. Direct the First Respondent to initiate enquiry and undertake suitable action against the Second and Third Respondents for the unreasonable delay in deciding and executing of orders pertaining to the Petitioner's application and appeal.

6. Direct the Tenth Respondent to pay the Petitioner Rs.3,00,00,000/-(Rupees Three Crores Only) as damages and compensation for the immense mental agony and humiliation and anxiety caused by the him to the Petitioner by his actions against the Petitioner, her late husband and youngest son.

7. Direct each of the Second and Third Respondents to pay the Petitioner Rs.1,00,00,000/-(Rupees One Crore Only) for the harassment and mental agony caused by them due to the inordinate delay and untenable orders passed by them culminating in the death of the Petitioner's husband.

8. Direct the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Respondents to pay Rs.7,00,00,000/-(Rupees Seven Crores only) as damages and compensation for the immense mental agony and humiliation and anxiety caused by them to the Petitioner and her late husband and youngest son."

4. In order to appreciate the petitioner's grievance, few relevant facts need mention which are stated hereinafter. The petitioner and her husband by a registered sale deed dated 07.08.1992, purchased the house at Albert Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore. Some time in the year 1996, respondent No. 8, who is the fourth son of the petitioner got married with respondent No.9. It is averred in the writ petition that during the first pregnancy of respondent No.9, respondent Nos. 8 and 9 requested the petitioner and her husband to occupy a portion of their house till delivery of their first child. The petitioner and her husband permitted respondents Nos.8 and 9 to occupy a portion of the house. It is also pleaded in the petition that on 12.06.2011, respondent Nos.8 and 9 assaulted the petitioner and her husband and a complaint was lodged with respondent No. 7. Thereafter on 07.10.2011 by two separate gift deeds, the petitioner's husband transferred one third share in the property to the petitioner and another one third share to his youngest son namely, Harish Fernandes. Thereafter, by a settlement deed dated 22.05.2014, petitioner's husband transferred remaining one third share of the property in favor of the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner became the owner two third share of the property in question. The petitioner by a release dated 06.08.2014, transferred her two third share in favour of her youngest son namely, Harish Fernandes. However, she retained right of residence in the house in question. Thus, the youngest son of the petitioner namely, Harish Fernandes became the absolute owner of the property in question.

5. Sometime in the year 2014, the petitioner as