H.P.SANDESH
Ravi – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
H.P. SANDESH, J.
1. Though these matters are listed for admission, with the consent of the petitioners' counsel and the learned HCGP, they are taken up for final disposal.
2. Heard the petitioners' counsel and also the learned HCGP for the respondent-State.
3. Though, all these cases arise out of different crime numbers of different police stations and pending before different Court, since issue involved in the cases is only question of law and the same is common in all these cases, they are taken up together for disposal by this common order.
4. The prayer sought in the petitions by invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is to quash the entire proceedings pending before the different Courts since the respective cases are registered for both the offences under the MMRD Act and Rules and Under IPC.
5. For the purpose of brevity and convenience, the particulars of the crime number, police station, name of the complainant and his designation are set out in the tabular column below:
| Sl. No. | Case Number | Crime Number | Police Station | Complainant's name and designation | Offences |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.