ALOK ARADHE, P.G.M.PATIL
Phulavati W/o Manohar Upadhye – Appellant
Versus
Prakash S/o Yashwant Upadhye – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2006 by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff (hereinafter referred as to as ‘the plaintiff’) seeking the relief of partition and separate possession has been partly decreed. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial Court, the defendant No.9 has filed cross-objections. Since common question of law and facts arise for consideration, in this appeal as well as cross-objection they were heard analogously and are decided by this common judgment.
2. The geneaology showing the relationship of the plaintiff and the defendants is as under:
|
| Yashwant (died on 18.02.1988 Champabai (Deft.No.8 | ||||||
| Annasabheb (died on 6.9.1988) | Prakash (D-1) | Pramila (D-10) | Pulavati (Pltf) | Veenutha (D-9) | Pusha (D-11) | Vijaymala (D-12) | |
| Vasanti (D-4) | Mahaveer (D-2) | Prithviraj (D-3) |
| ||||
| Vishwajit (D-5) | Veeradhawal (D-6) | Vidhya (D-7) | |||||
3. Facts giv
Danamma @ Suman Surpur vs. Amar
Srinivas Krishnarao Kango Vs. Narayan Devji Kango and others
G. Narayana Raju (dead) by his legal representative Vs. G. Chamaraju and others
Appasaheb Peerappa Chandgade Vs. Devendra Peerappa Chandgade & Ors.
Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Chander Sen
Mst. Rukhmabai vs. Lala Laxmi Narayan
K.V. Narayanaswami Iyer Vs. K.V. Ramkrishna Iyer
Mudi Gowda Gowdappa Vs. Ramchandra Ravagouda
Surendra Kumar Vs. Phoolchand (dead) through LRs & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.