K.SOMASHEKAR
Prabina Kumar Pradhan, S/o. Daya Nidhi Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
Petitioners are arraigned as Accused Nos.1, 10 and 11 in C.C.No.53018/2016 arising out of Cr.No.240/2011 of Hennur P.S. for the offences punishable under Sections 418, 419, 420, 465, 468, 467, 474 and 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC, 1860. This petition is filed seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.53018/2016 pending before the Court of the XI ACMM, Bangalore.
2. Factual matrix of the prosecution case is as under:
ANIL MAHAJAN vs. BHOR INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER ((2005) 10 SCC 228)
Alpic Finance Ltd. v. P. Sadasivan [(2001) 3 SCC 513 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 565]
Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi [(1976) 3 SCC 736 : 1976 SCC (Cri) 507]
PEPSI FOODS LTD. AND ANOTHER vs. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) v. Union of India [AIR 1965 SC 1167 : (1965) 2 SCR 192]
SHARAD KUMAR SANGHI vs. SANGITA RANE
PRIYANKA SRIVASTAVA vs. STATE OF U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.