JUDGMENT :

Aggrieved by the order of the trial Court dismissing their application against the defendants under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC, the plaintiffs have preferred the above appeal.

2. The appellants were the plaintiffs and the respondents were the defendants in O.S.No.4191/2007 before the trial Court. For the purpose of convenience, the parties will be referred to henceforth with their ranks before the trial Court.

Brief facts of the case:

3. Plaintiffs filed O.S.No.4191/2007 against the defendants before the VIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for declaration that the registered memorandum of understanding dated 30.04.2004 entered into between them and the defendants for joint development of the suit schedule property and the registered power of attorney dated 30.04.2004 relating to the suit schedule property are revoked, rescinded and terminated and that the defendants have no right to act and represent the plaintiffs in respect of the same. They also sought direction to the defendants to deliver the original title deeds of the schedule property, permanen