JYOTI MULIMANI
Trident Architectural Aluminium Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jindal Steels – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sri. Sibu Gopinathan learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Balaram M.L. for appellants and Sri. Madhukar Deshpande learned counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person.
This is an appeal from the Court of IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings before the Trial Court.
3. The facts of the case are simply stated as under:-
It is stated that the first defendant has got business association with the plaintiff partnership firm Jindal Steels and as per purchase orders placed by the first defendant, the plaintiff supplied goods to the first defendant. As per the terms of the agreement, it was mutually agreed that the first defendant has to pay the invoice amount within thirty days from the date of receipt of goods from the plaintiff and in failure, the first defendant was liable to pay interest at the rate of 21% per annum calculated from the date of respective materials supplied till the date of payment.
The first defendant maintained a running account with the plaintiff.
The first defendant made a purchase worth Rs.52,50,755/-(Rupees Fifty-Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Seven Hundred and F
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Seth Loonkaran Sethiya and Others Vs. Mr. Ivan E. John and Others
Dipchand Golencha Vs. Messrs. M. Abhechand and Co.
Tata Locomotive and Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Sardar Kartar Singh
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Canara Bank And Others Vs. Citi Bank N.A. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.