MAHESHAN NAGAPRASANNA
S. Sadashivappa – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
Maheshan Nagaprasanna, J.
1. The petitioner in this petition calls in question the order dated 15-03-2017 of the III Additional Sessions Judge at Tumkur in Special Case No. 266 of 2012 rejecting the application filed by him under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge from the proceedings initiated against him for the offences punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3(2)(5) and 3(1)(8) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Atrocities Act').
2. Sans details, facts in brief are as follows:-
The petitioner and the husband/deceased (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') of the complainant have lands which abut each other. It is alleged that the petitioner, his wife, T.S. Mangala and his elder brother H.S. Lingaraj were responsible for the death of the deceased. The allegation in the complaint against the petitioner, his wife and his brother was that the petitioner had filed several cases against the deceased from 1995 to 2012 and the last of the case filed was on 10-10-2012 and on the very next day the deceased had committed suicide. It is on the said complaint, F
AMALENDU PAL V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
GURUCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB (2020) 10 SCC 200
GURCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana
PEPSI FOODS LIMITED v. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (1998) 5 SCC 749
RAJIV THAPAR V. MADAN LAL KAPOOR (2013) 3 SCC 330
RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.