SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 581

R. DEVDAS
Mohammad Umair Shafi – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Law University – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.V. Vedachala
For the Respondents: Sachin B.S. and Pavan G.N.

ORDER :

R. Devdas, J.

1. This writ petition presents a bleak picture of how the 1st Regulations framed by the 1 respondent-Karnataka State' Law University have been violated, putting the career of the law students in jeopardy.

2. The petitioners are students of Five Year Law Course, studying in the 2nd respondent-institution. The crux of the matter is regarding the shortage of attendance of the petitioners either in the 4th semester, 5th semester, 6th semester or 7th semester, etc., and notwithstanding the deficiency, they are permitted to write examinations and the petitioners have been promoted to the next year course. In brief, the allegation against the petitioners is that, say in the 4th semester (end-of-semester examinations of the 2nd year) since, there was shortage of attendance, such a student could not have been permitted to take up the examinations, in terms of Regulations 13 of Regulations Governing The Five Year B.A., LL.B (Hons.) Integrated Honor's Degree Course in Law" (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations' for short). Such students in terms of Regulations 15(ii)(a) is required to repeat the course. However, all the petitioners were permitted to take up examinati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top