SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Kar) 2291

K.SOMASHEKAR
M. Babanna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


JUDGMENT/ORDER :

1. This petition is filed u/s.482 of Cr.PC., for quashment of the entire proceedings in PCR No.5543/2017 and for setting aside the order dated 5.5.2017 passed on the file of IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City, by referring the matter for investigation u/s.156(3) of Cr.PC., to SHO, Jayanagar Police Station.

2. Though the matter is listed for admission, heard the learned counsel namely Sri L.M. Chidanandayya, appearing for the petitioner through Video Conference and the learned counsel namely Sri Y.B. Kuntoji, appearing for Sri A.Feroze Nizam, the learned counsel on record for the second respondent complainant Sri K. Manoharan, who is present before the Court physically; Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, learned High Court Government Pleader for the first respondent is present before the Court physically, and the matter is taken up for final disposal. Perused the entire records.

3. The gist of the complaint registered by the second respondent complainant T.Manoharan against the accused petitioner M.Babanna is that the petitioner/accused is a share holder and owner of number of companies carrying on various types of business in Bengaluru City. The second respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top