SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 286

P.S.DINESH KUMAR, M.G.UMA
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
VANKATESHAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
K. Shashi Kiran Shetty, K.H. Somashekhara, Bhojegouda T. Koller, B.B. Patil.

JUDGMENT :

1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB [Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board] has presented this petition challenging the common order dated November 30, 2015 in W.P. No. 17836/2013 and W.P. Nos. 19607-19608/2013.

2. We have heard Shri. B.B. Patil, learned Advocate for appellant, Shri. K. Shashi Kiran Shetty, learned Senior Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 4 and Shri. Bhojegouda T.Koller, learned AGA for respondents No. 5 and 6.

3. Brief facts of the case are, respondents approached this Court with the instant writ petitions contending inter alia that they are the joint owners of properties measuring 5 acres 29 guntas in Sy. No. 46; 5 acre 17 guntas in Sy. No. 48; and 5 acres 29 guntas in Sy. No. 52 of Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. A preliminary Notification dated March 13, 2012, was issued by the State Government proposing to acquire the said lands for KIADB. Land owners filed their objections stating that 4 acres each in Sy. No. 46 and Sy. No. 52, were permitted to be diverted for nonagricultural purpose by the Deputy Commissioner vide order dated August 13, 2007 and they had established a brick industry. It was also stated in the objec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top