Back
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
B. P. MARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mohammad Nawaz, J.
1. This appeal is preferred by the accused feeling aggrieved by the Judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 101/2008, wherein, he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Sec. 138(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, Sec. 429 of IPC and Sec. 9 read with Sec. 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
2. Heard both sides and perused the material on record.
3. It is the case of prosecution that the accused has unauthorizedly drawn electricity connection to the fence put up by him around his land bearing Sy.No. 91/6 P-2 of Naganapura village, Hullalli Hobli, Nanjangud Taluk. On 24/11/2007, a female elephant came in contact with the said fencing and died due to electric shock.
4. Charges were framed against the accused for offences punishable under Sec. 9 r/w Sec. 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Sec. 429 IPC and Ss. 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
5. In order to bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution got examined 15 witnesses and got marked 18 documents.
6. The Trial Court has come to the conclusion that the accused
The judgment established the importance of mensrea and hunting intent in determining offences under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, and the element of intention or knowledge in the context of committ....
The main legal point established is the liability of the accused for the death of the elephant due to electrocution from an unauthorized electric fence, leading to convictions under the Electricity A....
The court determined that insufficient evidence existed to justify the conviction for death due to electrocution, emphasizing the prosecution's failure in proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Negligence alone does not satisfy the criteria for mischief under IPC; intention and knowledge are essential elements for establishing an offense.
State authorities cannot disconnect electricity based on incorrect attribution of fault when FIR exonerates the petitioner and requires due process and prior judicial directions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
