SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 949

R.DEVDAS, J.M.KHAZI
Sadeppa – Appellant
Versus
Gangavva – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
H.M.Dharigond, Advocate Shivaraj Ballolli, Advocate Shaila Bellikatti, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

R.DEVDAS J.

This Regular First Appeal is filed by one of the half brothers of the plaintiff, Smt.Gangavva, whose suit for partition and separate possession was decreed in part and the plaintiff was allotted half share in all the suit schedule properties excluding northern 4 acres in Sy.No.28 of Dhupadal village, Saundatti taluk, Belgaum district.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

3. One Ningappa Fakkirappa Paschapur had two wives, Basavva and Parvatavva. Through Basavva, Ningappa had a son, Sadeppa, while through Parvatavva, he had Gangavva, the plaintiff. The relationship is not disputed. Ningappa died on 11/8/1968. After the death of Ningappa, his son, Sadeppa got his name entered in the record of rights, as per M.E.No.1281 in respect of the immovable properties left behind by Ningappa. Under a sale deed dtd. 8/5/1992, Sadeppa-defendant No.1 purchased 4 acres 7 guntas in Sy.No.230 of Karalakatti village, in the name of his son Shivanand, defendant No.2. It is the contention of the plaintiff that since Sadeppa had no other source of income other than the agricultural income derived from land bearing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top