SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1564

V. SRISHANANDA
M A Sabitha – Appellant
Versus
Maneyapanda C Subbaiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, K.S. Bheemaiah, Advocate, Prabhugoud B. Tumbigi, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard Sri Prabhugoud B Tumbigi, learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel Sri Sanjay Kumar, for K.S. Bheemaiah, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 (A & B). Perused the records.

2. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.7/2000. Parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as per their original ranking before the Trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. A suit came to be filed by the plaintiffs seeking partition of her 1/3rd share after deducting the area sold by father of the first plaintiff. It is contended in the plaint that defendants belong to Maneyapanda family of Kodava race governed by Hindu Law. Sri. Thammaiah is their common ancestor and he had three sons, namely:

Ponnappa, Nanjappa and Subbaiah. Among them, Ponnappa had two sons by name Kaverappa and Thammaiah. Kaverappa died leaving behind his two sons namely; Poovaiah and Kushalappa. Thammaiah had two sons by name Muthappa and Ponnappa. Nanjappa had only one son by name Appachu. Said Appachu died leaving behind his daughter Sabitha, who is the first plaintiff. Subbaiah had only one son by name Chengappa.

He also died leaving behind his only son Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top