SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1363

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.Sandesh, J.
Lokesh S.l. - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 7908/2021
Decided On : 03-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
V.S.Vinayaka, Advocate, K.Ranganathaiah, Advocate

The court has the discretion to grant bail under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. based on the gravity of the offences and the allegations made in the complaint.

Headnote:

Sec. 438 - Bail - The court allowed the petition for bail under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought bail in connection with a case registered for offences under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and sought bail under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that considering the gravity of the offences and the allegations made in the complaint, it was a fit case to exercise the powers under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. The petition for bail was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail in connection with the case registered under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the gravity of the offences and the allegations made in the complaint in deciding to grant bail under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The petition for bail was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime No.109/2021 registered by the Chikkanayakanahalli Police Station for the offences punishable under Ss. 3, 4, 5, 7 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that on 28/8/2021 at about 7.20 p.m. the complainant and his staff were on patrolling duty at bus stop near Banashankari Choultry and temple, he received the credible information that prostitution business was running illegally in the house of one Srinivas by one Vinodamma to earn money illegally by brining men and women for the said purpose. On the basis of the said information, raid was conducted on the said house and found that there was illegal prostitution business was running and one person was escaped from the spot and they tried to chase him but they were unable to apprehend him. Based on the complaint, police have registered the case for the aforesaid offences.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a false case has been registered against this petitioner and this petitioner was not present at the spot on the date of the incident and he has not committed any offences as alleged and hence, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C.

5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State would submit that this petitioner ran away from the spot and after the registration of the case it came to know that this petitioner also indulged in the said activities. Hence, prayed to dismiss the petition.

6. Having heard the respective counsel, also on perusal of the documents on record and the offences invoked against this petitioner herein and considering the gravity of the offences and the allegations made in the complaint, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Sec. 438 of Cr.P.C.

7. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following: ORDER

    The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.109/2021 registered by the Chikkanayakanahalli Police Station for the offences punishable under Ss. 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, subject to the following conditions:-

      (i) The petitioner shall surrender himself before the Investigating Officer within ten days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000.00 (Rupees Two Lakh only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer.

        (ii) The petitioner shall not indulge in hampering the investigation or tampering the prosecution witnesses.

          (iii) The petitioner shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation and he shall appear before the Investigating Officer, as and when called for.

            (iv) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Investigating Officer without prior permission till the charge sheet is filed or for a period of three months, whichever is earlier.

              (v) The petitioner shall mark his attendance once in a month i.e., on 30th of every month between 10.00 am and 5.00 pm., before the Investigating Officer for a period of three months or till the charge sheet is filed, whichever is earlier.

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top