ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.
Chitikina Veerababu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 1472 of 2022
Decided On : 11-03-2022
Section 438 - Bail - Pre-arrest bail granted based on lack of valid identification and dispute over the identity of the accused at the scene of the offence
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was the sole accused in a case under Section 7B r/w Section 8B of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2020, where police found 70 litres of ID liquor at the scene of the offence. The petitioner was not found at the scene of the offence with the contraband and there was a serious dispute over his identity as the person who ran away from the scene.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no valid basis for the identification of the petitioner as the person who ran away from the scene of the offence, and therefore, the petitioner was entitled to pre-arrest bail.
Issues: Dispute over the identity of the accused at the scene of the offence
Ratio Decidendi: Lack of valid identification and serious dispute over the identity of the accused at the scene of the offence entitles the petitioner to pre-arrest bail.
Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was allowed, and the petitioner was granted pre-arrest bail upon execution of a self bond for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each.
JUDGMENT
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J. - This petition is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest.
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.191 of 2022 of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rajamahendravaram South, East Godavari District.
3. a case under Section 7B r/w Section 8B of the andhra Pradesh Prohibition (amendment) act, 2020, was registered against him in the above crime.
4. It is the case of the prosecution that on 10.02.2022 when the police were conducting raids to detect prohibition and excise offences and when they reached the scene of offence, they found one person at the scene of offence with two plastic cans and he ran away after seeing the police leaving the said plastic cans. Police found 70 litres of ID liquor in the said two cans at the scene of offence. Police came to know that the petitioner herein is the said person who ran away from the scene of offence. Therefore, the petitioner is shown as accused in the above crime.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
6. admittedly, the petitioner was not found at the scene of offence along with any such contraband and he was not apprehended along with any such ID liquor by the police at the scene of offence. although it is stated that the police identified the said person who ran away from the scene of offence as the petitioner herein, there is no valid basis for the said identification. Therefore, the very identity of the person who ran away from the scene of offence is in serious dispute. So, in the said facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail.
7. Resultantly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner in the above crime, he shall be forthwith released on bail on execution of self bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rajamahendravaram South, East Godavari District.
Lack of valid identification and dispute over the identity of the accused at the scene of the offence can entitle the accused to pre-arrest bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the validity of identification and the existence of a serious dispute regarding the identity of the accused can entitle the accused to pre-arr....
The validity of identification and the entitlement to pre-arrest bail based on the lack of valid basis for identification and serious dispute over the person's identity.
The validity of identification and the disputed identity of the accused influenced the decision to grant pre-arrest bail.
The validity of identification and the prima facie well-founded nature of the accusation are crucial in determining the grant of pre-arrest bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.