SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 80

SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
H M Rudrakumar – Appellant
Versus
Gowramma H R – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J. - The appellant / party-in-person is present physically before the Court and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file petition.

2. The said submission of the appellant / party-in-person is taken on record. In view of the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to the appellant to file a petition.

3. Registry is directed to return the documents to the appellant / party-in-person.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top