SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1195

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. Natarajan, J.
H. Siddesh - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 6391 of 2022
Decided On : 27-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Sri Kiran Kumar H, Adv, for the Petitioner; Sri Krishnakumar K.K, for the Respondent

The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of family dispute, nature of injury, and custody duration in granting bail and imposing conditions to prevent prejudice to the prosecution case.

Headnote:

Bail - Family Dispute - The court granted bail to the petitioner-accused No.1 in a case involving offences punishable under Sections 307, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, considering the family dispute and the simple nature of the injury, and imposing certain conditions to ensure no prejudice to the prosecution case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner-accused No.1 filed a petition for granting regular bail in a case involving offences punishable under Sections 307, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner subjected the complainant's mother to physical and mental cruelty and assaulted the complainant, leading to the filing of the complaint.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was a family dispute between the petitioner and the complainant, and the injury sustained was simple in nature. Considering the circumstances and the fact that the petitioner had been in custody for almost a month, the court granted bail with certain conditions.

Issues: The issues involved the alleged physical and mental cruelty by the petitioner towards the complainant's mother, the assault on the complainant, and the family dispute between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the family dispute, the simple nature of the injury, and the petitioner's custody for almost a month in granting bail and imposing specific conditions to prevent prejudice to the prosecution case.

Final Decision: The criminal petition was allowed, and the Committal Court was directed to release the petitioner-accused No.1 on bail, subject to specific conditions to ensure compliance and prevent prejudice to the prosecution case.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for granting regular bail in Crime No.177/2022 registered by Hennur Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant filed a complaint on 25.06.2022 alleging that this petitioner is said to be her father. This petitioner used to subject her mother to physical and mental cruelty demanding her share from her father's property by abusing, assaulting and threatening her every day and thrown out the complainant, her mother and her brother from the house. The complainant also alleged that accused No.1 had an illicit relationship with accused No.2. Thereafter, the complainant's mother initiated criminal proceeding against accused No.1 in Crime No.155/2022 and after knowing the same, accused No.1 used to force the complainant, her mother and her brother to withdraw the case and also posed life threat for them. That on 25.06.2022 at 9.00 p.m., accused No.1 came along with accused No.2 in Innova Car, picked up quarrel and demanded to withdraw the complaint filed against them and at that time, accused Nos.1 and 2 said to be assaulted complainant's mother and also assaulted the complainant when she intervened. Accused No.2 said to be held on her legs and at the same time, accused No.1 squeezed her neck with an intention to commit murder. Thereafter her mother came and rescued, she came out and lodged this complaint. After registering the case, the Police arrested this petitioner on 27.06.2022 and he was remanded to the judicial custody. His bail petition came to be rejected, hence, he is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that this petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated only to harass him. He also suffered stomach pain, fever, admitted in the hospital and discharged from the hospital only a week from the date of complaint. There is no injury sustained by the complainant. The petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions that may be imposed by this Court. The petitioner is in the custody for almost one month. Hence, prayed for granting bail.

5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader seriously objected the petition and prayed for dismissing the petition.

6. Having heard the arguments and on perusal of the records, it is not in dispute that the complainant is the daughter of the petitioner. There was a family dispute between them, therefore, the wife of the petitioner has already filed a PCR case and got it referred to the Police and registered a case in Crime No.155/2022 for the offence punishable under Section 498A and other offences against both accused Nos.1 and 2. The main allegation against accused No.2 is she is paramount of accused No.1 who is the present petitioner. On that background, a quarrel took place when the petitioner trying to squeeze her neck and her mother came and rescued. They said to be assaulted and abused in the filthy language. Accused No.2 is absconding who is having illicit relationship with this petitioner-accused No.1. Admittedly, the petitioner is the father of the complainant. He is in custody for almost from one month. Most of the investigation might have been completed by the Police. Only left out for filing the charge-sheet. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of case, the injury is simple in nature and the petitioner is in custody for almost one month, by imposing certain conditions, if the bail is granted to the petitioner, no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution case. Hence, I pass the following

ORDER

Accordingly, criminal petition is allowed. The Committal Court is directed to release the petitioner-accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.177/2022 registered Polic

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top