SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1561

H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Bajaj Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Recovery Officer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Gowtham Dev C. Ullal, Advocate, Sharadamba A.R., Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This appeal under Sec. 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by the claimant being aggrieved by the judgment dtd. 12/10/2018 passed by the MACT, Hassan in MVC No.2036/2017.

2. Facts giving rise to the filing of the appeal briefly stated are that on 10/9/2017 at about 06.00 p.m., the claimant along with her friends was traveling in the KSRTC Bus bearing Registration No.KA-13-F1884. When it reached near Hattavara Gate, the driver of the said Bus drove the same in a rash and negligent manner with high speed. As a result of the aforesaid accident, the claimant fell down and sustained grievous injuries and was hospitalized.

3. The claimant filed a petition under Sec. 166 of the Act seeking compensation. It was pleaded that she spent huge amount towards medical expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded that the accident occurred purely on account of the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver.

4. On service of notice, the respondent has appeared through counsel and filed written statement in which the averments made in the petition were denied. It was pleaded that the petition itself is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top