SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 592

H. B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY
Arun Vincent Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
S. mala – Respondent


ORDER

1. Learned counsels from both side in all these four matters along with their respective clients as identified by them, are physically present in the Court.

2. In all these four revision petitions, the present petitioner has challenged the confirmation of his conviction for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the N.I. Act). The judgment of conviction and order on sentence passed by the learned XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the Trial Court) in all these four matters were confirmed by the Fast Tract Court-III, Mayohall, Bangalore (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the first appellate Court) in the Criminal Appeals preferred by the present petitioner, who was the accused in the Trial Court.

3. The respondent herein was the complainant in the Trial Court. Now both the parties have come up with memorandum of settlement in all these four matters, in which regard, they have filed separate interlocutory applications, i.e. I.A.No.2/2022 in each petition, under Section 147 of the N.I. Act read with Section 320 (6) of the Code of Crimin

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top