SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 388

ALOK ARADHE, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Harsha S/o Chandrappa – Appellant
Versus
Bhagya D/o Madaiah – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : L. Govindraj.
For the Respondent: Venkatesh B. Pyagi.

JUDGMENT :

VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, J.

1. This appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2012 passed in M.C. No. 161/2010 by the Family Court, Mysore, by which the petition filed by the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage, was dismissed.

2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are that the marriage of the appellant and respondent was solemnized on 22.04.2004 at Mysore as per customs and rites and out of the wedlock a female child was born on 23.08.2005. It is averred that the respondent joined the matrimonial home at Bangalore, where the appellant was working in a private company. It is further averred that after the birth of the child the respondent started showing different attitude towards the appellant and started to quarrel with him and his parents by using un-parliamentary words. It is also averred that the respondent used to quarrel and create embarrassment in social gatherings in front of relatives and friends.

3. It is pleaded that the respondent was not doing household work, used to misbehave with the appellant and his family members, she was adamant, ill tempered, and she used to threat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top