M. NAGAPRASANNA
Ashok M. S. , S/o. Srinivasa – Appellant
Versus
Anti Corruption Bureau, Rep. by its Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sting operations arise from allegations against public servants. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal compliance for registration of crimes is critical. (Para 15 , 24) |
| 3. differentiation of sting operation legality based on context. (Para 30 , 33) |
| 4. conclusion affirms lawful resolutions for implicated parties. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
ORDER :
Conglomeration of these cases arises out of crimes registered against the petitioners on account of sting operations conducted by the media. Since all these petitions bring up a common challenge to sting operations so conducted and consequently the offences so alleged, they are taken up together and considered by this order. The only variation would be the incidence and registration of crime, or the crime as the case would be. But, one stream that runs through the entire challenge is veracity of sting operation. In the light of the incidents being different, I deem it appropriate to narrate brief facts in each case.
Criminal Petitions Nos. 7430 of 2022, 7431 of 2022, 7473 of 2022 and Writ Petition No.15582 of 2022:
2. The 2nd respondent is the complainant in all these cases. A complaint comes to be registered on 03-08-2022 before the then Anti-Corrup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.