SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
H.P.SANDESH, RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, JJ.
Linganagouda @ Santosh, S/o. Martandagouda – Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.100190 of 2019 C/w Criminal Appeal No.100284 of 2019
Decided on : 28-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI. L.S.SULLAD, SRI.M.B.GUNDAWADE, ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
For the Respondent:SRI.M.B.GUNDAWADE, SRI.SANTOSH NARAGUND, SRI.B.V.SOMAPUR, SRI.B.C.JNANAYYASWAMI, ADVOCATE

The court established that the prosecution proved the conspiracy and murder charges against the accused through credible eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence, leading to their conviction.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 302, 201, 506, and 143, 147, 364 - Appeals against acquittal - The Trial Court acquitted accused persons of serious charges including murder, but the appellate court found sufficient evidence of conspiracy and murder, leading to conviction - The prosecution established motive through civil disputes and ill-will among the parties, corroborated by witness testimonies and circumstantial evidence. (Paras 1-4, 37-96)

(B) Evidence - Standard of proof - The court emphasized that in cases of circumstantial evidence, all circumstances must form a complete chain and must be consistent with the guilt of the accused - The evidence of the sole eyewitness was deemed credible despite some discrepancies, as it was corroborated by other evidence. (Paras 92-96)

(C) Sentencing - The court imposed life imprisonment on the convicted accused, emphasizing the gravity of the crime and the need for justice for the victim's family. (Paras 6-10)

JUDGMENT :

1. These two appeals are filed by the son of the deceased-victim and the State challenging the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court against the accused persons for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 120-B, 364, 302, 201 and 506 read with Section 149 of IPC and prayed the Court to set aside the judgment passed in Sessions Case No.37/2012 dated 30.03.2019 and convict the accused persons and sentence them for the charges levelled against them.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that one Martandagouda was missing from 11.12.2011, the same was communicated to his son, who was studying Engineering at Laxmeshwar by his mother that the deceased Martandagouda not returned to home from 11.12.2011 onwards. The son of the deceased Linganagouda came to Kurtakoti and made searches and could not trace him. Hence, he lodged the complaint in terms of Ex.P2 with the jurisdictional police on 16.12.2011 at 15.45 hours which was registered as Crime No.277/2011. While lodging the complaint, the description of clothes lost worn by him and mobile IME number of the handset of said Martandagouda was given in the complaint and he was not traced. That on 03.01.2012, the complainant gave further statement vide Ex.P1 at 19.45 hours to the police, he has stated his uncle Virupakshagouda i.e., accused No.1 was trying to sell lands for the purpose of satisfying his bad vices, his father-Martandagouda had objected for the same and had helped one Smt. Seetabai, the sister of Virupakshagouda-accused No.1 in filing a suit for partition against Virupakshagouda. Further, the paternal aunt of his father namely, Renukabai Patil was given lands bearing Sy.Nos.332 and 329, totally measuring an extent of 15 acres. The said Renukabai got married at an old age and she did not have any issues. He has further stated that after the death of Renukabi, it was agreed between her brothers that the said lands should go to the father of Virupakshagouda i.e. Melagirigowda. After the death of Renukabai, Virupakshagoda accused No.1 was trying to get the said lands transferred to his name and was negotiating to sell the same. Hence, the said Martandagouda had also filed suit for partition in respect of land bearing Sy.Nos.332 and 329 and had obtained an order of stay on 07.12.2011. The complainant suspected the role of accused No.1 and the accused No.1 was angry with this development of assisting his sister to file a suit and obtaining an order of stay. Hence, he conspired with accused Nos.2 to 6 and earlier, the accused No.3 was tenant in the lands of the family of Martandagouda and he was having enmity against Martandagouda in removing him from the cultivation and accused No.2, friend of accused No.1, and all of them have joined their hands and within 2 to 3 days of stay obtained by Martandagouda, he went missing and stated about the ill-will. It is also an allegation that said Virupakshagouda within a short span of deceased went missing, has sold the very said land. It is also a motive for committing the murder that Neelavva i.e., accused No.4 was having illicit relationship with the complainant’s father and she was also absconding from the village and heard the rumours that accused No.4 was also missing after the said Martandagouda was missing. Hence, suspected that accused Nos.1, 2, 4 and said Ningappa, in order to eliminate the Martandagouda, conspired each other and on 11.12.2011, abducted him from Kurtakoti and murdered him and disposed off the body. The said accused persons were apprehended and investigation is conducted. It is also an allegation that accused No.5 was having illicit relationship with accused No.6 and deceased also instructed accused No.4 to bring the accused No.6 for his lust and all of them were also having grudge against the deceased. Hence, it is the case of the prosecution that all the accused persons joined their hands and conspired with each other and eliminated the deceased. The police after the inv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top