SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 912

ROHIT B. DEO, URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Dinesh Devidasrao Tatte – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.Y.Ghurde, Advocate, N.S.Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. - Heard finally with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties.

2. By way of this appeal, the appellant had challenged the judgment and order of sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.226/2012 dtd. 25/09/2019 by which present appellant-accused No.1 is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5000.00 in default of payment of fine accused to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

3. Facts of the prosecution case in brief are as under :

A] On 15/07/2012, the brother of the deceased namely Sudhir Pandurangji Bele had lodged the report contending that the deceased Surekha is his sister. Her marriage was solemnized with the accused/appellant and from the said wedlock she begotten two sons. It is further alleged that the present appellant/accused along with acquitted accused, his parents demanded Rs.50, 000.00 from the parents of the deceased and on that count she was ill-treated and harassed by assaulting her. Prior to 5 - 6 months of incident, appellant/accused has beaten deceased Surekha due to which she was hospitalized in the Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Medical College and Hospi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top