SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1554

M. G. UMA
H M Shivappa – Appellant
Versus
Chandrappa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abubakar Shafi, Advocate, Basavanna K.M., Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The plaintiffs are before this Court impugning the judgment and decree dtd. 15/7/2014 passed in RA No.53 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hunsur, sitting at Periyapatna (hereinafter referred to as 'the First Appellate Court' for brevity), whereunder, the judgment and decree dtd. 23/6/2012 passed in OS No.93 of 2007 on the file of the learned Civil Judge and JMFC at Periyapatna (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court' for brevity) was set aside and the suit of the plaintiffs came to be dismissed by allowing the appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their status and rank before the Trial Court.

3. Brief facts of the case are that, the plaintiffs filed the suit OS No.93 of 2007 against the defendants for declaration that they are the absolute owners of the schedule property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The schedule property is described as 20 guntas of land in Sy.No.1/1A (Old No.1).

4. It is contended that plaintiff No.1 - Shivappa purchased the schedule pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top